Supporters of artistic freedom, and some psychological researchers, posit the "catharsis hypothesis." This theory suggests that individuals with "dark fantasies" can satisfy these urges through fiction without acting on them in reality. From this perspective, the availability of extreme comics serves as a safety valve, potentially reducing instances of real-world violence by providing a victimless outlet for taboo desires. They argue that there is no empirical evidence to suggest a causal link between reading violent erotica and committing violent crimes.
The most significant criticism leveled against the Fansadox collection is the ethical implication of simulating non-consent and extreme violence. The most significant criticism leveled against the Fansadox
Conversely, other jurisdictions maintain stricter controls. In the United Kingdom, the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 criminalized the possession of "prohibited images of children," which includes non-photographic images (such as drawings or CGI) depicting the sexual abuse of a child. Similar laws exist in Canada and Australia. This creates a complex legal landscape for digital distributors, who must navigate a patchwork of international laws regarding what constitutes "harmful" fiction. Similar laws exist in Canada and Australia