Nuria Millan Testing Repack

| Phase | Activities | Data Sources | |-------|------------|--------------| | 2.1 Definition | Formalization of the “repack” concept, taxonomy of test packages, mapping to CI/CD stages. | Internal design docs (Millán, 2022‑2023). | | 2.2 Pilot Implementation | Three independent pilot projects (A‑WebApp, B‑MobileSDK, C‑Data‑Pipeline) executed over 6 months. | CI logs, Jira tickets, TestRail, Git metrics. | | 2.3 Measurement | - Cycle‑time (from commit to production).
- Defect leakage (post‑release bugs/10 KLOC).
- Test coverage (statement, branch, API).
- Team sentiment (quarterly pulse survey). | Jenkins, SonarQube, Bugzilla, SurveyMonkey. | | 2.4 Comparative Analysis | Baseline (pre‑repack) vs. post‑repack performance. | Historical data (2019‑2021). | | 2.5 Risk & Cost Assessment | Resource utilisation, licensing, skill‑gap analysis. | Cloud‑provider billing, HR training logs. |

All quantitative data were anonymized and aggregated to preserve confidentiality. nuria millan testing repack

| Metric | Baseline (pre‑repack) | Post‑repack | Δ (Δ%) | |--------|----------------------|-------------|--------| | Avg. Cycle‑time | 4.2 weeks | 2.6 weeks | ‑38 % | | Post‑release defects | 12.4 /10 KLOC | 9.1 /10 KLOC | ‑27 % | | Test coverage (statement) | 71 % | 78 % | +7 % | | Mean TP execution time | 14 min | 9 min | ‑36 % | | Team satisfaction (5‑point Likert) | 3.4 | 4.2 | +22 % | | Phase | Activities | Data Sources |

All figures are averages across the three pilots; standard deviations are ≤ 5 %. | Metric | Baseline (pre‑repack) | Post‑repack |

For pharmacy directors and compliance officers looking to adopt the Nuria Millan standard, here is a practical step-by-step guide: