Squilink

To understand Squilink’s potential, stack it against existing standards:

| Feature | Bluetooth 5.3 | Wi-Fi 6 | Squilink | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Pairing Time | 2-5 seconds | 10 seconds | 0.003 seconds | | Power Draw | 10mW | 100mW | 0.6mW | | Max Devices | 7 (piconet) | 256 | 1024 (ring) | | File Transfer Resume | No (restart) | Yes (via TCP/IP) | Stateful auto-resume | | Infrastructure | None | Router required | None (peer-to-peer) | squilink

While Wi-Fi wins on raw speed (gigabits) and Bluetooth wins on ubiquity, Squilink wins on connection reliability in motion. For drone swarms, warehouse robots, or athletes with wearable sensors, Squilink is superior. Click a link, go to a destination

Traditional links are one-way streets. Click a link, go to a destination. Squilink works both ways. If you edit the source document, the destination updates. If a collaborator updates the destination, the source receives the delta changes. This creates a true peer-to-peer mesh of information. If a collaborator updates the destination, the source

As of this writing, Squilink is not commercially available. However, a beta developer kit (the "Squilink Spark") is rumored to ship to select GitHub contributors. If you want to prepare: