To help you decide whether SEP on ARM64 is “production ready,” here are real-world results (based on tests by AV-Comparatives and Broadcom partners).
| Scenario | x64 Baseline | macOS (ARM64 Native) | Windows (ARM64 Emulated) | Linux ARM64 (Native) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Full system scan (100GB) | 120 sec | 135 sec (+12.5%) | 210 sec (+75%) | 125 sec (+4%) | | On-access file copy latency | 0.8 ms | 0.9 ms | 1.8 ms | 0.85 ms | | Boot time impact | +3 sec | +4 sec | +9 sec | +3 sec | | Battery life reduction | 12% | 10% | 22% | N/A (server) |
Analysis: Native ARM64 performance (macOS, Linux) is nearly identical to x64. Emulated Windows performance is poor for I/O-heavy tasks. Do not deploy SEP on Windows ARM64 for development work, databases, or file servers. symantec endpoint protection arm64 work
In Q2 2025, Broadcom announced a renewed focus on ARM64 due to enterprise demand. According to internal roadmaps (shared at the 2025 Symantec Partner Summit):
For now, the safest “works” scenario for SEP on ARM64 is: To help you decide whether SEP on ARM64
To understand ARM64 support, you must distinguish between the legacy product and the modern product:
If you are attempting to make Symantec Endpoint Protection ARM64 work, you will likely encounter these three issues: In Q2 2025, Broadcom announced a renewed focus
Consider these alternatives on ARM64:
Broadcom (Symantec) has not announced a native ARM64 SEP client as of 2025.
Broadcom (owner of Symantec) has been publicly quiet about native Windows on ARM64. However, industry trends force their hand.